[Standards] XEP-136 and XEP-59 implementation comments

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Apr 1 19:31:04 UTC 2008

Tomasz Sterna wrote:
> Dnia 2008-03-30, nie o godzinie 13:20 +0300, Alexander Tsvyashchenko
> pisze:
>> There's one other idea I have, but it may break backward
>> compatibility  
>> and I'm not sure if it doesn't break something else: what if JIDs
>> like  
>> 'domain.com' are treated like 'wildcards' (like it is now), but  
>> '@domain.com' are considered to be exact matches of domain JID (so,  
>> basically, JID with empty user name)?
>> The same for resources: 'user at domain.com' is treated like wildcard,  
>> but 'user at domain.com/' is exact match of bare JID?
> I think it is counter-intuitive.
> Logic would hint that domain.com is exact match and @domain.com is a
> wild match.
> Similar with user at domain.com is exact match and user at domain.com/ is wild
> match. 



Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080401/de7d91be/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list