[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: IO DATA
stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Apr 4 23:33:40 UTC 2008
Luis Peralta wrote:
> Overall I like this XEP. What I missed are more possible status
> values for the commands. Being in execution and completed is way too
> simple for some applications. The initial state after submitting a
> command would be 'accepted' and letting the client know that it is in
> fact sending commands to a batch service. IMO, the state diagram
> should something like: accepted -> executing -> completed, even if in
> the current spec 'executing' means both things.
Is this at the XEP-50 level or the IO-Data level?
> I would also explicitly refer the possibility of canceling a
> running command by using xep-50 'cancel' action.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards