[Standards] Message Mine'ing
stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Dec 2 21:24:38 UTC 2008
Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> Am 02.12.2008 um 21:55 schrieb Joe Hildebrand:
>> Hopefully, adding the XEP-146 interaction section will make this more
>> clear. If we think this important to do without changing presence, we
>> can either reuse XEP-85 "gone", or add a new state of "moved" that is
>> an unlock hint.
> Maybe we want threads in the core so we can have threads and move them?
We have threads in RFC 3921 but no one really / fully implements them.
I think that XEP-0085 <gone/> is fine as a hint to unlock and send to
the bare JID again.
More information about the Standards