[Standards] Missing point in XEP-0115: Entity Capabilities ?
dave at cridland.net
Thu Dec 11 08:27:16 UTC 2008
On Thu Dec 11 00:17:44 2008, Jehan wrote:
> But then, what if (even if it should never happen!) the other entity
> set some other "node" value which is not yours?
> 1/ Should you anyway answer, and you give again the right node
> value in
> your result query?
No. That would be against XEP-0030.
> 2/ Should you skip the service discovery request?
No, that would break RFC 3921. (And, folks, not answering unknown
iq's can get you disconnected, if a server uses XEP-0199 to probe for
a live client, like we do...)
> 3/ Should you send an error? And if so, which error? Maybe an error
> type "cancel" with "item-not-found" subnode?
This one is the only option.
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
More information about the Standards