[Standards] XEP-0255 (Location Query)

Stephen Pendleton stephenpendleton at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 11 21:15:30 UTC 2008

Some comments I have on 0255 during implementation:
- XEP-0080 uses <lat>, <lon>, <alt> instead of <latitude>, <longitude>... so the examples need to be changed. The schema looks right though. 
- Is Example 7 allowed in XMPP/pubsub? It looks like the component is publishing to the entities node. I suppose there is nothing wrong with that, I just haven't seen it before.
> To: standards at xmpp.org> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 22:43:45 +0100> From: helge at buddycloud.com> Subject: [Standards] XEP-0255 (Location Query)> > > Some comments to the XEP-0255 / "Location Query" draft (http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0255.html):> > 1) Beacon signal strength seems to have been forgotten in the draft specification. This is a mistake and I will correct it. > > 2) In the development project from which XEP-0255 was born (Buddycloud), we never considered using Timing Advance (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timing_advance) for triangulation between cell towers, simply because it was too troublesome getting the deep API access required on Symbian, our main client platform.> > However I assume this is something other implementers may want to use, so i think it should be covered by the XEP.> > The specification currently uses a generic data type for all radio beacons (cell towers, wifi access points, bluetooth devices). However timing advance would only apply to cell towers. In order to keep this symmetry, and as timing advance translate directly to distance (scaled by a factor of 550m per unit), i am pondering whether to add the somewhat more generic field 'distance' rather than 'timing advance'. I am not sure how a client would derive distance to, say a wifi access point, but I think that is more likely than a timing advance value...> > Any thoughts?> > > Helge> 
Send e-mail faster without improving your typing skills.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20081211/4d0d941c/attachment.html>

More information about the Standards mailing list