[Standards] shared XML editing update

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Feb 4 22:19:50 UTC 2008


Joonas Govenius wrote:
> Boyd Fletcher wrote:
>> we still do not believe that SXE is appropriate for whiteboarding
>> especially
>> when scaled to hundreds of concurrent users in a single session.
>>   
> I actually think SXE would scale to many users very well because:
> 
> a) it makes no difference for an individual client who the edits come
> from or how many users there are in the session
> 
> b) the server (if one is used) doesn't do any processing of the edits;
> it merely forwards them to the participants.
> 
> c) SXE causes minimal "locking" of the document; only simultaneous edits
> to the same DOM node conflict.

That seems reasonable to me.

> On the other hand, SXE doesn't currently specify any access control to
> limit who can edit the document. That may be a problem for the kind of
> large sessions that you're thinking of.

IMHO a large session would be done in a MUC room or via a specialized
component, and that's the level at which floor control would happen.

> Also, as Fabio Forno pointed out, SXE may be problematic with a high
> volume of edits but, in the case of whiteboarding at least, the volume
> would probably not increase very much with the number of participants
> because most participant would merely "watch".

I think that would be the case for the vast majority of large editing
sessions.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080204/bb9e9f29/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list