[Standards] XEP-0060 version 1.1pre1

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Fri Feb 15 18:35:46 UTC 2008


Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Ralph Meijer wrote:
>> On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 11:57 -0700, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> Per recent list discussion, Ralph Meijer and I have provisionally
>>> adjusted XEP-0060 (Publish-Subscribe) to cover the use case of
>>> disassociating a node from a collection.
>>> [..]
>> I see the attribute to refer to the node being dis/associated is still
>> called 'id', where I proposed 'node' for consistency with the rest of
>> the spec.
> 
> +1, will fix.
> 
>> Furthermore, although you added <associate/> and <disassociate/> to the
>> schema definition of <collection>, the elements themselves don't have a
>> schema themselves.
> 
> Oops, I will fix that.

I corrected those errors in version 1.11pre2...

Rendered spec:

http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/tmp/xep-0060-1.11.html

Diff from 1.11pre1 to 1.11.pre:

http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0060.xml?r1=1674&r2=1682

Diff from 1.10 to 1.11pre2:

http://svn.xmpp.org:18080/browse/XMPP/trunk/extensions/xep-0060.xml?r1=1555&r2=1682

>> The change for SHIM looks good to me, too. As I am looking into an HTTP
>> gateway to XMPP pubsub, I am wondering about the names of the headers
>> defined in this spec, though. They are very unlike other headers that
>> registered with the XMPP Registrar and headers used in other protocols
>> (HTTP, mail, news and MIME).
>>
>> RFC 3864 establishes the IANA registry of header fields and includes
>> advice on header field naming. As most of the headers in the SHIM
>> registry just point to their equivalent use in other protocols, I am
>> wondering if we should follow suit and move our registry there, while
>> adjusting the pubsub header fields to comply.
> 
> I try not to bother the IANA more than necessary. However I will think
> about this. Is anyone actively using the headers yet? Will we break
> backwards-compatibility if we modify the header names now?

Do you have examples of how you'd like the header names to change?

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080215/34e81f79/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list