[Standards] [devcon] abuse reporting

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Feb 27 16:11:52 UTC 2008

Pedro Melo wrote:
> Hi,
> On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Pedro Melo wrote:
>>> The first time I saw example 1 above, I though "hmms.. we might need a
>>> reason here...".
>>> So if we add a <reason> to the <abuse> stanza, we could merge 161 with
>>> this.
>> Is that a human-readable reason or a machine-readable reason? Or do we
>> want both, perhaps?
> I think a machine-readable version is important because most of the time
> these reports will be generated by automated processes.
> Human readable might be interesting for one-off reporting by a end-user.
> But this spec focus on server-to-server reporting.

Agreed. I'll define some machine-readable conditions as child elements,
so people could always define other conditions in other namespaces if


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080227/0c458fe4/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list