[Standards] Any replacement for <offline> notification from XEP-0022?

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Jul 3 18:07:41 UTC 2008

Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Le vendredi 27 juin 2008, Michal 'vorner' Vaner a écrit :
>> Hello
>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 09:50:59PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
>>> I see that XEP-0085 ("Chat State Notifications") which can be thought
>>> as being a "spiritual successor" to the deprecated XEP-0022 ("Message
>>> Events") lacks support for the "message is stored in the server's
>>> offline storage" notification.
>> Well, if it wasn't stored, you get an error. And if the server told you
>> it did store it, you would know the user is not invisible, does not have
>> you in his ignore list or so. It is not something people should want you
>> to know.
>> So, if you do not get an error, you can count on the message being
>> delivered (now or later).
>> (If it is different in real life, then it is problem of implementation
>> and not of protocol).
>> Did it help?
> If there is a network problem you might get nothing back.

Won't XEP-0198 solve this (when it's done and implemented and deployed)?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080703/61521a11/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list