[Standards] presence priority -1 issues
melo at simplicidade.org
Thu Jul 31 16:19:43 UTC 2008
On Jul 30, 2008, at 8:40 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Dave Cridland wrote:
>> On Wed Jul 30 13:55:56 2008, Pedro Melo wrote:
>>> The most important part of -1 resources are their caps. For
>>> example, I can have a calendar app logged in with my own jid,
>>> accepting some namespace for calendar updates or meeting requests.
>> Are you suggesting a sort of negative disco feature which indicates
>> that the XMPP entity is not an IM resource at all? Could this be
>> done with a suitable category/type? Moving forward, this would
>> allow clever clients to observe that it wasn't a IM client capable
>> of handling calendaring requests, but a dumb calendaring bot
>> working on behalf of the user.
>> If you're not suggesting this, can I suggest it? :-)
> I think he's suggesting that the disco identity of your calendar
> would be something like this:
> <identity category='automation' type='calendar'/>
But you would need to complement this with <features> to specify the
protocol that the agent uses to receive calendar requests/updates.
XMPP ID: melo at simplicidade.org
More information about the Standards