[Standards] presence priority -1 issues
melo at simplicidade.org
Thu Jul 31 16:44:08 UTC 2008
On Jul 31, 2008, at 5:21 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Thu Jul 31 17:17:40 2008, Pedro Melo wrote:
>>> Moving forward, this would allow clever clients to observe that
>>> it wasn't a IM client capable of handling calendaring requests,
>>> but a dumb calendaring bot working on behalf of the user.
>> Not following.
> Clients could have an integrated calendaring app, allowing both chat
> and calendaring traffic to happen to the same full jid.
> Alternately, it may only do one or the other.
Yes, but then you would only need to publish the proper <feature>.
What makes a automated system try a certain protocol is the feature,
not the identity. The identity automation/calender (per Peter example)
is only needed to mark a resource as a non-IM resource.
So a clever Calendar application that also allows chat would probably
still announce itself with a client/pc but would also set <feature> to
support cal-dav-over-xmpp, or whatever.
XMPP ID: melo at simplicidade.org
More information about the Standards