[Standards] [devcon] abuse reporting

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Sat Mar 1 03:29:34 UTC 2008


Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Pedro Melo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> Pedro Melo wrote:
>>>> The first time I saw example 1 above, I though "hmms.. we might need a
>>>> reason here...".
>>>>
>>>> So if we add a <reason> to the <abuse> stanza, we could merge 161 with
>>>> this.
>>> Is that a human-readable reason or a machine-readable reason? Or do we
>>> want both, perhaps?
>> I think a machine-readable version is important because most of the time
>> these reports will be generated by automated processes.
>>
>> Human readable might be interesting for one-off reporting by a end-user.
>> But this spec focus on server-to-server reporting.
> 
> Agreed. I'll define some machine-readable conditions as child elements,
> so people could always define other conditions in other namespaces if
> needed.

Done in version 0.0.3:

http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/abuse-reporting.html

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080229/04a44812/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list