[Standards] [devcon] abuse reporting
stpeter at stpeter.im
Sat Mar 1 03:29:34 UTC 2008
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Pedro Melo wrote:
>> On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:59 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> Pedro Melo wrote:
>>>> The first time I saw example 1 above, I though "hmms.. we might need a
>>>> reason here...".
>>>> So if we add a <reason> to the <abuse> stanza, we could merge 161 with
>>> Is that a human-readable reason or a machine-readable reason? Or do we
>>> want both, perhaps?
>> I think a machine-readable version is important because most of the time
>> these reports will be generated by automated processes.
>> Human readable might be interesting for one-off reporting by a end-user.
>> But this spec focus on server-to-server reporting.
> Agreed. I'll define some machine-readable conditions as child elements,
> so people could always define other conditions in other namespaces if
Done in version 0.0.3:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards