[Standards] Strictness of disco types
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 6 21:27:12 UTC 2008
Daniel Henninger wrote:
> So there are two types listed. text and irc. Are these meant to be
> strict type choices, or suggestions? Is it theoretically bad to use
> something other than those two choices?
The reasons for some of the service discovery identities are lost in the
mists of time. From the XMPP perspective the "conference/irc" type is
probably better described as "gateway/irc", because IRC simply is a text
conferencing technology. And a text chat room that simultaneously
functions as a MUC room and an interface to an IRC channel should
probably have two identities: "conference/text" and "gateway/irc".
The XMPP Registrar would be happy to update the registrations if
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards