[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Roster Versioning

Joe Hildebrand hildjj at gmail.com
Mon Mar 10 20:46:44 UTC 2008

On Mar 10, 2008, at 2:32 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:

> On Mon Mar 10 20:17:53 2008, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>> In section 2.4, would it be easier to implement in existing clients  
>> if:
>> - The response to the iq/get with version 0 was a full roster, in  
>> the  existing format, with the addition of the current version number
> I think it is, isn't it? The spec actually allows a diff from  
> nothing, but in this instance, it doesn't matter whether it's  
> technically a "diff" or not, since you'll get full items for  
> everything that's changed, and everything will have done.

Oh.  I hadn't fully understood the diff attribute.  If we keep it, can  
it get it's own example?

Joe Hildebrand

More information about the Standards mailing list