[Standards] Whiteboard XEP, Gajim and GSoC2008
boyd.fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Mon Mar 10 21:17:16 UTC 2008
its the later (2) since we don¹t really cover in the spec how to render the
whiteboard other than specifying the SVG compliance version. However in SVG
they (1 & 2) are essentially the same thing.
since there will always be interpretation issues with specifications the
only way to verify the other clients are working correctly would be to
develop a set of test whiteboards and make someone the reference
implementation for comparison.
On 3/10/08 5:12 PM, "Dave Cridland" <dave at cridland.net> wrote:
> On Mon Mar 10 21:03:52 2008, Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL
> J9935 wrote:
>> > we send it as a series of whiteboard commands to draw the
>> > whiteboard in
>> > band.
> Sorry, there's two things you may mean here, and the difference is
> crucial. Do you mean:
> 1) We send commands to the other party such that they have a visually
> equivalent whiteboard document.
> 2) We send commands to the other party such that they have an
> identical chunk of XML to render as a whiteboard document.
> I'd like to state for the record that I have no preference as to the
> right thing here.
> Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at jabber.org
> - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
> - http://dave.cridland.net/
> Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Standards