[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Roster Versioning
dave at cridland.net
Mon Mar 17 16:00:23 UTC 2008
On Mon Mar 17 15:22:28 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Pedro Melo wrote:
> > Lets not abuse the meaning of <message> just because we like their
> > network properties, like we abused <presence> in the past because
> > broadcasts well.
Absolutely. So I'm looking forward to seeing the update to XEP-0060
which changes PubSub pushes from being <message/> to <iq/>, in (for
example) section 188.8.131.52.
Or, alternately, could someone explain to me why the use of
<message/> stanzas for the 184.108.40.206 case is not "abuse", whereas would
be. Looks to me like they're the same use-case.
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at jabber.org
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
More information about the Standards