[Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Roster Versioning

Richard Dobson richard at dobson-i.net
Mon Mar 17 17:20:13 UTC 2008


> Very funny. :P
>
> We use messages there in part because using IQs would require knowing
> the full JID (and stock pubsub services do not know that).
>
> But that's neither here nor there. The question is whether:
>
> (1) acking an occasional roster push from the server to the client
> (where BTW the server *does* know your full JID) is a serious problem
> that we need to solve because it wastes large amounts of bandwidth
>
> or
>
> (2) sending roster pushes via <message/> is a pretty optimization that
> is more elegant than what we developed in 1999, but it fundamentally
> unnecessary
>
> I think (2) obtains. Therefore I think it's just fine to keep IQs for
> roster pushes. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
>
> Peter
>   

Also surely if you are doing roster sequencing I would have thought it 
would be important for the server to know if you have received the push 
or not in order to keep things in sync correctly? So the ack is actually 
quite useful.

Richard





More information about the Standards mailing list