[Standards] XEP-0176 ICE candidate properties

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 20 21:28:27 UTC 2008

Paul Witty wrote:
> Working towards an implementation of ICE with Jingle, the definition of
> ufrag and pwd don't seem to match between XEP-0176 and ICE CODE.  ufrag
> and pwd are defined per candidate in the XEP, but seem to be per stream
> in ICE-19.  Section 15.4 says "The "ice-pwd" and "ice-ufrag" attributes
> can appear at either the session-level or media-level."  Should they be
> moved to attributes of the transport or content element describing a
> stream, rather than being specified per candidate?

Good catch. I think those attributes belong at the <transport/> level,
not the <content/> level (they are specific to the ice-udp and ice-tcp
transports). Will fix.


Peter Saint-Andre

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20080320/e1ec07ed/attachment.bin>

More information about the Standards mailing list