[Standards] XEP-0176 ICE candidate properties
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Mar 20 21:28:27 UTC 2008
Paul Witty wrote:
> Working towards an implementation of ICE with Jingle, the definition of
> ufrag and pwd don't seem to match between XEP-0176 and ICE CODE. ufrag
> and pwd are defined per candidate in the XEP, but seem to be per stream
> in ICE-19. Section 15.4 says "The "ice-pwd" and "ice-ufrag" attributes
> can appear at either the session-level or media-level." Should they be
> moved to attributes of the transport or content element describing a
> stream, rather than being specified per candidate?
Good catch. I think those attributes belong at the <transport/> level,
not the <content/> level (they are specific to the ice-udp and ice-tcp
transports). Will fix.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards