[Standards] mobile strengths and weaknesses
stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue Mar 25 23:05:40 UTC 2008
Fabio Forno wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> Yes that makes sense. But it sounds as if we don't yet know enough to
>> define session hush and session pause very well. Perhaps we need to talk
>> with more people who care about this kind of feature (as I did recently
>> at the eComm conference).
> Indeed suspend is not difficult, it's just one more "command" to be
> added to stanza acknowledgments (or an attribute to the existing <r/>
> or <a/>), simply telling the server to suspend the connection (timings
> can be negotiated at session level, such as we already do in BOSH with
> a careful setting of "wait" and "inactivity" attributes).
Yes I will add that to XEP-0198.
> Hush is the one that is difficult, since it is a sort of dynamic
> privacy list in which we set which messages can be considered
> important and at with which importance. Hush moreover has a meaning
> both when connected (e.g. I'd like to delay some messages for
> optimizing compression) and when disconnected (which messages can
> start a new connection?), and for this reason I think it fits a
> completely different XEP and we can wait for it...
I wonder if hush is really just a special privacy list, but I haven't
had time to work out if that's true.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards