[Standards] [jdev] Presence of type "available" not allowed?
stpeter at stpeter.im
Sun May 4 03:10:22 UTC 2008
On 05/03/2008 2:51 PM, Remko Tronçon wrote:
>> 1. Modify existing documentation and implementations to a more strict
>> behavior that would treat values not mentionned in RFC 3921 as illegal.
> What documentation mentions the type 'available'? I know some (older)
> implementations used to use 'available' as a type, and most
> implementations just ignore an unknown type and treat it as
> 'available', which i think is a sensible thing to do. If you are a
> purist, you could return an error if you encounter it, but I think
> it's much more work to return errors than ignore it on the client
> Anyway, if you see the type somewhere, it should be reported as a bug,
> and the software/documentation should be fixed.
I have found two instances of this bug, both in examples from XEP-0200.
They have been corrected:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards