[Standards] MUC History clearing

Boyd Fletcher boyd.fletcher at je.jfcom.mil
Tue May 13 21:10:49 UTC 2008


so where do we stand? old way or xep-50 approach? I think the old way is
better from a testing and compliance standpoint. if you start making
extensions to MUC, testing interoperability is going to be a problem.

boyd



On 5/9/08 5:47 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:

> On 05/09/2008 3:20 PM, Gaston Dombiak wrote:
>> Good point. Based on where we are standing now I think I would prefer
>> adding this functionality following the existing style instead of
>> having a hybrid solution. And then in a future version of the XEP do
>> a major refactoring and change things to use ad-hoc commands.
> 
> Gosh that would be major refactoring indeed. I don't know if that would
> be worth the effort...
> 
> Peter




More information about the Standards mailing list