[Standards] MUC History clearing

Joe Hildebrand hildjj at gmail.com
Wed May 14 00:04:18 UTC 2008


Any change we make to support clearing history is "the new way".  It has no
bearing on testing or interoperability.

On 5/13/08 3:10 PM, "Boyd Fletcher" <boyd.fletcher at je.jfcom.mil> wrote:

> so where do we stand? old way or xep-50 approach? I think the old way is
> better from a testing and compliance standpoint. if you start making
> extensions to MUC, testing interoperability is going to be a problem.
> 
> boyd
> 
> 
> 
> On 5/9/08 5:47 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
> 
>> On 05/09/2008 3:20 PM, Gaston Dombiak wrote:
>>> Good point. Based on where we are standing now I think I would prefer
>>> adding this functionality following the existing style instead of
>>> having a hybrid solution. And then in a future version of the XEP do
>>> a major refactoring and change things to use ad-hoc commands.
>> 
>> Gosh that would be major refactoring indeed. I don't know if that would
>> be worth the effort...
>> 
>> Peter
> 





More information about the Standards mailing list