[Standards] 2009 compliance suites?
stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue May 27 16:33:05 UTC 2008
On 05/26/2008 3:59 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Tomasz Sterna <tomek at xiaoka.com> wrote:
>> How would 2009 suites be different to 2008 suites that we do with them
>> more than with 2008 suites?
> People have, slowly, started using the 2008 suites to mark up the
> features of their projects, and as guidance, 2009 would just be more
> of the same in terms of guidance for features.
I think the 2009 suites might remove some of the RECOMMENDED features or
change them to REQUIRED (IMHO it makes no sense to have a RECOMMENDED
feature -- either something is needed for compliance or it's not).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards