[Standards] 2009 compliance suites?
stpeter at stpeter.im
Tue May 27 16:50:41 UTC 2008
On 05/27/2008 10:37 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> I think the 2009 suites might remove some of the RECOMMENDED features or
>> change them to REQUIRED (IMHO it makes no sense to have a RECOMMENDED
>> feature -- either something is needed for compliance or it's not).
> I'm pretty happy with the way we previously used RECOMMENDED, I think
> it's a good heads-up that it'll be required the following year.
Except that sometimes it may not be required, in which case the
RECOMMENDED is a false alarm. An example might be XEP-0155 in 2008,
which we expected to lead into ESessions as REQUIRED for 2009 in some
suite (which now seems unlikely).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 7338 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
More information about the Standards