[Standards] 2009 compliance suites?
kevin at kismith.co.uk
Tue May 27 17:02:25 UTC 2008
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
>> I'm pretty happy with the way we previously used RECOMMENDED, I think
>> it's a good heads-up that it'll be required the following year.
> Except that sometimes it may not be required, in which case the
> RECOMMENDED is a false alarm. An example might be XEP-0155 in 2008,
> which we expected to lead into ESessions as REQUIRED for 2009 in some
> suite (which now seems unlikely).
Sure, I'm happy with that as a reason not to do it again :)
More information about the Standards