[Standards] roster sequencing

Pavel Simerda pavlix at pavlix.net
Thu Sep 4 21:00:16 UTC 2008

Yep, that would be a good idea. Thanks!

Btw... I suggest a clean-up of XEP-59 also for my user-search
proposal I sent to the pubsub list.

It's not even in INBOX yet but if you want to look:



On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:19:36 +0200
"Fabio Forno" <fabio.forno at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:52 PM, Peter Saint-Andre
> <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
> > Pavel Simerda wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 for a generic method
> >
> > Yeah, that means I need to re-work XEP-0237. :(
> Since Pavel has reminded XEP-59, what about transforming xep-237 into
> an extension of it? XEP-59 allows to set the boundaries of a result
> set by setting a first of last item; by extending the possible
> conditions (one is the sequence number, are there others?) the changes
> should be trivial. Instead of asking all the items after "last",
> request all the items after "sequence-no"
> This is also the answer to the other question about what happens to
> large roster when there are stanza size limitations: just return a
> partial set and then ask the remaining ones.


Web: http://www.pavlix.net/
Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net
OpenID: pavlix.net

More information about the Standards mailing list