[Standards] roster sequencing

Pavel Simerda pavlix at pavlix.net
Sat Sep 6 13:33:16 UTC 2008


Maybe because XE-0237 is just an optimization, not a solution to
problems with stanza limits?

Pavel

On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 21:50:04 +0100
Pedro Melo <melo at simplicidade.org> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 4, 2008, at 6:52 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 
> > Pavel Simerda wrote:
> >> +1 for a generic method
> >
> > Yeah, that means I need to re-work XEP-0237. :(
> 
> :(
> 
> I wouldn't. We talked a lot to get 237 to the place where it is now.  
> In the process I *believe* we discussed using 0059.
> 
> I find 0237 elegant and simple to implement on most servers.
> 
> Before starting 0237 all over again, I was hoping to hear from
> server implementors about this.
> 
> I understand the desire of having solutions that work likes tools,  
> that we can reuse on several places. But  just because it looks like  
> a nail, we shouldn't just get the hammer.
> 
> For example, rosters have this property where a single "age" flag
> can be used to send the roster delta with little effort on the
> server (assuming a SQL-style backend). Do we sacrifice that just to
> use a standard "tool"?
> 
> Its not clear to me.
> 
> Best regards,


-- 

Web: http://www.pavlix.net/
Jabber & Mail: pavlix(at)pavlix.net
OpenID: pavlix.net



More information about the Standards mailing list