[Standards] [E2E] Why we need a <body> element
justin-keyword-jabber.093179 at affinix.com
Tue Sep 30 18:02:48 UTC 2008
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 10:21:56 Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Tue Sep 30 17:42:58 2008, Jonathan Schleifer wrote:
> > Am 30.09.2008 um 17:33 schrieb Dave Cridland:
> >> And to cover our coversation elsewhere (through that funny
> >> "Instant Messaging" thing), a downside of including <body> is
> >> that a client might assume it's a reasonable alternative, whereas
> >> otherwise it could bounce the message (type="error") which would
> >> cause the sender to re-initiate the session.
> > Messages with unknown stuff are simply ignored, the RFC says so
> > IIRC.
> Hmmm. I wonder if we could move toward changing that. Messages
> without any known stuff feel like they should result in an error.
I've tried to address this in XEP-226: Message Stanza Profiles.
More information about the Standards