[Standards] XEP-0175 1.2rc1
skeltoac at gmail.com
Fri Aug 14 01:43:07 UTC 2009
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Brian Cully<bcully at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13-Aug-2009, at 21:06, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Whether any of these attack vectors are worrisome is another matter.
> I tend not to think so. In the case where a bare JID is reused (e.g.,
> "anonymous at example.com") then it's acceptable to generate a resource (thus,
> the SHOULD should become a MAY in the XEP), and it comes down to a
> particular server implementation and how it generates bare JIDs. In the case
> where the bare JID is truly unique to any given stream then there's no
> reason to generate a resource.
I would also like to see SHOULD replaced by MAY in that sentence.
Other than that I like the changes.
More information about the Standards