[Standards] XEP-0030 - to attribute required?

Remko Tronçon remko at el-tramo.be
Wed Aug 19 09:58:46 UTC 2009


> Why is this? Should it be there? (For what it's worth, I'm not even sure it
> *can* be there - XEP-0030 can't change <iq/> semantics).

Odd indeed. I agree that it shouldn't be there. Maybe it's a
historical leftover?

cheers,
Remko



More information about the Standards mailing list