[Standards] XEP-0030 - to attribute required?

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Wed Aug 19 10:29:38 UTC 2009

On Wed Aug 19 11:23:49 2009, Klaus Hartke wrote:
> 2009/8/19 Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>:
> > after all, a C2S session needn't have a to attribute on an
> > <iq/>, it means the same as the client's own bare jid.
> I always thought an empty 'to' attribute means the same as the  
> remote
> party's jid. (see xep-0247)

Well, XEP-0247 streams aren't C2S - in the XEP-0247 case, it's the  
remote peer. In some respects, on a C2S link, it's also the remote  
peer, but your client is connecting to your XMPP account - but  
anyway, semantics...

Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade

More information about the Standards mailing list