[Standards] XEP-0030 - to attribute required?

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Mon Aug 24 18:21:27 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 8/19/09 3:58 AM, Remko Tronçon wrote:
>> Why is this? Should it be there? (For what it's worth, I'm not even sure it
>> *can* be there - XEP-0030 can't change <iq/> semantics).
> 
> Odd indeed. I agree that it shouldn't be there. Maybe it's a
> historical leftover?

I think so. Will fix. Certainly you could send a disco request to your
bare JID implicitly by not including a 'to'.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqS2icACgkQNL8k5A2w/vwigACgmoqHCntkoi4S9AyinF/Nudjb
CKMAoM69yOf4qc/LeqtTfzVgy0S5Szyg
=ZbOP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Standards mailing list