[Standards] XEP-0047: IBB without Disco support

Pedro Melo melo at simplicidade.org
Sun Aug 30 10:19:43 UTC 2009


Err...

I meant http://jabber.org/protocol/ibb as the namespace... :)

Best regards,

On 2009/08/30, at 11:13, Pedro Melo wrote:

> Hi,
>
> the current text of IBB (XEP-0047) doesn't mention discovery  
> support. There isn't a feature to announce support for IBB.
>
> Maybe it should include something like (copied from XEP-0261):
>
> To advertise its support for the In-Band Bytestreams, when replying to
> Service Discovery information requests an entity MUST return URNs for
> any version of this protocol that the entity supports -- e.g.,
> "urn:xmpp:ibb:0" for this version (see Namespace Versioning regarding
> the possibility of incrementing the version number).
>
>
> Example N. Service discovery information request
>
> <iq from='romeo at montague.lit/orchard' id='uw72g176' to='juliet at capulet.lit 
> /balcony' type='get'>
>   <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info'/>
> </iq>
>
>
> Example N. Service discovery information response
>
> <iq from='juliet at capulet.lit/balcony' id='uw72g176' to='romeo at montague.lit 
> /orchard' type='result'>
>   <query xmlns='http://jabber.org/protocol/disco#info'>
>     <feature var='urn:xmpp:ibb:1'/>
>   </query>
> </iq>
>
> In order for an application to determine whether an entity supports  
> this
> protocol, where possible it SHOULD use the dynamic, presence- based
> profile of service discovery defined in Entity Capabilities.  
> However, if
> an application has not received entity capabilities information from  
> an
> entity, it SHOULD use explicit service discovery instead.
>
> Best regards,




More information about the Standards mailing list