[Standards] [Roster|Data] Versioning

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu Feb 19 21:31:34 UTC 2009


Fabio Forno wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im> wrote:
> [...]
>> Given that I see only two (perhaps three) domains in which we need data
>> versioning, I don't feel a strong need for a general solution.
> 
> From the client perspective I don't see many differences. Just a bit
> of concern about extending the roster:iq namespace which is in
> rfc9321, while adding a dedicated namespace is more xmlish (but I
> think it's just a question of style, since I don't think there are any
> validating xmpp parsers out there, and an additional attribute would
> break nothing)

I think this would be a good revision to include in rfc3921bis. See my
post on the xmppwg list just now:

http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/xmppwg/2009-February/002507.html

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6751 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20090219/b4ff79f0/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list