[Standards] various rfc3920bis feedback
fippo at goodadvice.pages.de
Wed Feb 25 19:22:29 UTC 2009
Dave Cridland wrote:
>> There is no 'subsequent' auth with 0178 yet, is there?
>> There are three different options:
>> 1) do 0178 and add subsequent auth (including graceful failure)
>> 2) do 0178 for the first authorization and use piggybacking (with
>> graceful failure again) for subsequent authorization... err...
>> 3) ignore any 0178 offers and do piggybacking for everything.
>> Might be a problem if servers require 0178 and really mean it.
> I'm thinking we aim for (3), with signalling as required.
Because of the fallback to (some kind of) dialback for sender
verification if x509 does not work?
More information about the Standards