[Standards] XMPP-IM - presence subscription handling
zarevucky.jiri at gmail.com
Thu Feb 26 12:15:16 UTC 2009
>> Sorry, you are right in this. I overlooked a part defining it as
>> subject to configuration.
>> I still think this can't be done without numerous problem.
> Ok, I might forget your bullying... and You might try to look again and
> reconsider, with the rfc3920-1 and also the bis variants (as I will of
> course do also, but I don't have so much time, you can imagine).
> I recommend to finish this thread... and start a new one, rather
> concentrating on the technical points and correct reasoning.
If that works for you. I think I'll just wait until I have some time
to code it. Seems that some people don't settle for simple description
of the idea and problems.
More information about the Standards