[Standards] XEP-0045 (Multi-User chat): Use case not covered

Mickael Remond mickael.remond at process-one.net
Fri Feb 27 14:06:06 UTC 2009


Hello,

The following use case does not seem covered if you want to use non
anonymous or semi anonymous rooms (to get / display user data for
example):

1. Enter a persistent room and say something bad.
2. Leave the room.
3. Someone enter the room and get the archived (contextual message).
As identity (JID) is disclosed only on presence packet and the user is
not available, the identity of the sender has been lost and cannot be used.

A possible option would be to specify that server should broadcast
identity on presence for unavailable contacts that are still referenced
in discussion history.

Any comments ?

-- 
Mickaël Rémond
 http://www.process-one.net/



More information about the Standards mailing list