[Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)

Mickaël Rémond mickael.remond at process-one.net
Fri Feb 27 14:49:48 UTC 2009


Le 27 févr. 09 à 15:34, Dave Cridland a écrit :

> No, I disagree, the sm-id is allocated by the server, the server can  
> put as much meaning into it as it wants. It's still opaque to the  
> client.
>
> If the server's implementation means that it needs to have access to  
> the full jid, then it should encode that into the sm-id.
>
> There is abolutely no need at all to make such encoding interoperable.

Except promoting good practice.


More information about the Standards mailing list