[Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)

Mickael Remond mickael.remond at process-one.net
Fri Feb 27 15:41:39 UTC 2009


Hello,

Dave Cridland wrote:

> No, I disagree, the sm-id is allocated by the server, the server can
> put as much meaning into it as it wants. It's still opaque to the
> client.

If I read the spec correctly the stream feature packet that contains the
sm-id is send before the bind, right ?

So, you do not have the full JID (you miss the resource) at this time
and as a result, cannot include it as a server in the sm-id.

-- 
Mickaël Rémond
 http://www.process-one.net/



More information about the Standards mailing list