[Standards] XEP-0198 suggestion (Stream management)
mickael.remond at process-one.net
Fri Feb 27 15:41:39 UTC 2009
Dave Cridland wrote:
> No, I disagree, the sm-id is allocated by the server, the server can
> put as much meaning into it as it wants. It's still opaque to the
If I read the spec correctly the stream feature packet that contains the
sm-id is send before the bind, right ?
So, you do not have the full JID (you miss the resource) at this time
and as a result, cannot include it as a server in the sm-id.
More information about the Standards