[Standards] DEFERRED: XEP-0209 (Metacontacts)

Jiří Zárevúcký zarevucky.jiri at gmail.com
Thu Jan 22 20:09:25 UTC 2009


2009/1/22 Yann Leboulanger <asterix at lagaule.org>:
> each contact has its own name, there is not a name for the "group" of
> contacts.
> I don't see how it could be usefull to have a name from the metacontact
> "group".
>

I think it could be useful in some scenarios.

Example:

contact at whatever.org - "Contact - Company"
contact at google.com - "Contact - GTalk"
123456789 at icq.whatever.org - "Contact - ICQ"
----------------------------------------------------------------
Metacontact - "Contact"

Rationale: every sub-contact can have some
explanation/specification/location specified in name

Perhaps it would not be very useful for most people, I don't know. I
personally would use it in this way.



More information about the Standards mailing list