[Standards] Anonymous SASL and Presence

Jiří Zárevúcky zarevucky.jiri at gmail.com
Tue Jun 30 15:25:19 UTC 2009


2009/6/30 Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>:
> On Tue Jun 30 16:20:25 2009, Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
>>
>> 2009/6/30 Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>:
>> > On Tue Jun 30 15:33:35 2009, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It does. Anonymous users get given a unique (~random) JID, with an
>> >> empty roster. So you /can/ send presence, you just either have to send
>> >> it to a known address, or add people to your temporary roster first.
>> >
>> > FWIW, although I agree that's what *should* happen, nothing in the
>> > specifications available says that's what does.
>> >
>>
>> Actually, XMPP-IM does. At least for broadcasts as long as roster is
>> enabled. Of course the roster may be disabled. Routing of directed
>> presences is not strictly required, too.
>
> No, I meant the "unique (~random) JID", and the "empty" or "temporary
> roster". None of those things are specified.
>

There is nothing that would classify "random JID" as something
special. The same applies to "empty" and "temporary" roster. And you
can't say rules of XMPP-IM don't apply to them.

> What happens if you have a roster is, of course, specified.
>



More information about the Standards mailing list