[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0237 (Roster Versioning)
zarevucky.jiri at gmail.com
Wed May 13 22:06:08 UTC 2009
2009/5/13 Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>:
> Now, what Jiří is saying is that in the examples, we're illustrating what
> appears to be the method described in 5.2, but giving it the behaviour of an
> implementation using the method described in 5.3, whereas using a "pure"
> sequence value is simpler to understand.
Thanks, that's exactly what I meant.
> Still, as long as not *all* examples show simple integer
> sequences, I think it might benefit some examples. (Perhaps Example 3, for
Yeah, I was proposing way back including one example on integer
versions and one on simple "modified/unmodified" checking with hash.
That would illustrate pure sequential roster versions well, while
still showing other possibilities are to be expected.
More information about the Standards