[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0237 (Roster Versioning)
stpeter at stpeter.im
Thu May 14 19:05:38 UTC 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 5/14/09 1:01 PM, Curtis King wrote:
>> The way I read your email you want to remove the ability to use
>> hashes, which implies making 'ver' not opaque to the client, and I can
>> only ask what benefits having the client be able to interpret 'ver'
> It makes things easier to understand and hopefully to implement. In
> this case pretty much eliminates interoperability issues.
What precisely are the interoperability issues? This is not a matter of
server-to-server communication. If the server to which I connect uses
hashes and the server to which you connect uses sequence numbers and
Matt's server uses the names of people who post in this thread, how does
interoperability break? The only way that interop would break here is if
clients are treating versions as something other than opaque, which they
are not supposed to do.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Standards