[Standards] SIFT

Dirk Meyer dmeyer at tzi.de
Sat May 16 12:52:30 UTC 2009

Jiří Zárevúcky wrote:
> 2009/5/16 Dirk Meyer <dmeyer at tzi.de>:
>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/sift.html
>> I only took a quick look at the spec and maybe I missed it, but what
>> happens to an IQ that got filtered? If a client sends an IQ it expects
>> an answer and that answer maybe 'client not available'. What is the
>> answer if the recipient filters the IQ?
> I believe server should reply with "service-unavailable" on behalf of
> the client. That way it is consistent with XMPP-CORE and doesn't
> introduce any security problems.

Sounds good. This should be part of section 3.3


Time passed, which, basically, is its job.
  -- Terry Pratchett (in: Equal Rites)

More information about the Standards mailing list