[Standards] MUC, MUC, glorious MUC

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Nov 18 01:25:26 UTC 2009


On 11/17/09 3:57 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> In addition to my previous list of things, we need to add:
> 
> a) Specific error elements for MUC to distinguish error cases properly.

You mean no more hacky status codes? ;-)

> b) I'd personally like to have users control their anonymity on join -
> that is, you join a chatroom potentially saying "do expose my jid", or
> "do not expose my jid", the default being that exposing the jid is okay,
> but up to the room.

With the understand that the room might overrule you, sure.

> Does anyone want to volunteer to start writing some of these up, and
> revising XEP-0045 itself, too?

I think you've volunteered. :P

/psa


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6820 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/attachments/20091117/2fe860c0/attachment.bin>


More information about the Standards mailing list