[Standards] MUC, MUC, glorious MUC

Dave Cridland dave at cridland.net
Wed Nov 18 09:09:55 UTC 2009


------- Original message -------
> From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter at stpeter.im>
> Sent: 18/11/'09,  1:25
>
> On 11/17/09 3:57 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> In addition to my previous list of things, we need to add:
>>
>> a) Specific error elements for MUC to distinguish error cases properly.
>
> You mean no more hacky status codes? ;-)

I mean no more hacky status codes. I have to look those up every time 
customers mention them as it is.

>
>> b) I'd personally like to have users control their anonymity on join -
>> that is, you join a chatroom potentially saying "do expose my jid", or
>> "do not expose my jid", the default being that exposing the jid is okay,
>> but up to the room.
>
> With the understand that the room might overrule you, sure.

Well, I was thinking that if you require anonymity, but the room does full 
disclosure, you wouldn't be able to join.

>
>> Does anyone want to volunteer to start writing some of these up, and
>> revising XEP-0045 itself, too?
>
> I think you've volunteered. :P

This may have been my evil plan all along, though.

Dave. 



More information about the Standards mailing list