[Standards] Fwd: [TechReview] Review of XEP-0234, 0260 and 0261.

Peter Saint-Andre stpeter at stpeter.im
Wed Aug 18 22:14:59 UTC 2010

On 8/17/10 6:15 AM, Yann Leboulanger wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 02:03 PM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>> On 17 August 2010 12:52, Peter Saint-Andre<stpeter at stpeter.im>  wrote:
>>> On 8/17/10 5:37 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
>>>> Also I've had bad experience (as a user) with transfer resumption thus
>>>> far... I think some clients just ignore the range, and send from 0,
>>>> causing the range-supporting recipient to receive the start of the
>>>> file twice. So either we make range support mandatory, or we need some
>>>> way for the initiator to announce it.
>>> If anything, I'd prefer to remove ranges from XEP-0096. Do any clients
>>> support them?
>> Without checking, I believe Miranda and Gajim do.
>> Matthew
> Yep Gajim supports that to resume a transfer.

Hi Yann, thanks for the confirmation. Is this feature useful? Does it
improve the user experience? Does it make file transfer more reliable?
Does it introduce complexities into the code? Is the cost worth the
benefit? Just curious. :)


Peter Saint-Andre

More information about the Standards mailing list