[Standards] Fwd: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15
dave at cridland.net
Thu Feb 18 16:05:52 UTC 2010
On Thu Feb 18 14:47:22 2010, Tobias Markmann wrote:
> On 18.02.2010, at 14:51, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> >> 2. Compression makes multicast structures unnecessary.
> > It does? A lot of people are skeptical about the argument "oh
> > worry about how verbose this is, compression will solve the
> It doesn't make multicast structures unnecessary. Using multicast
> structures you can avoid to generate/serialize/parse quite some XML
> stanzas. So you have less volume to compress and at the other side
> it's less XML to parse. Sure the multicast handling takes some CPU
> too but that's minimal compared to general purpose compression.
We're not seeing any bottleneck on CPU at this time on our
deployments, I have to say.
I do, personally, have a bottleneck on implementing stuff, though...
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at dave.cridland.net
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
More information about the Standards