[Standards] IQ Pubsub again (was Re: Fwd: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15)

Evgeniy Khramtsov xramtsov at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 08:47:13 UTC 2010


Pedro Melo wrote:
>> There are a myriad of ways the original IQ or the ack could get lost.  My
>> point is that the response does not serve any value to the sender, since I
>> don't believe there is anything useful to be done when the sender does not
>> receive the ack.  Resending is almost always going to be wrong.
>>     
>
> Why? I think the exact opposite is true. We have item ID's so we can
> ignore duplicates.
>
> Bye,
>   

I guess because if a sender doesn't receive the response, this doesn't 
mean a receiver doesn't receive the request.

-- 
Regards,
Evgeniy Khramtsov, ProcessOne.
xmpp:xram at jabber.ru.




More information about the Standards mailing list