[Standards] IQ Pubsub again (was Re: Fwd: Meeting minutes 2010-02-15)

Fabio Forno fabio.forno at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 09:35:27 UTC 2010

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 7:34 AM, Joe Hildebrand
<joe.hildebrand at webex.com> wrote:
> There are a myriad of ways the original IQ or the ack could get lost.  My
> point is that the response does not serve any value to the sender, since I
> don't believe there is anything useful to be done when the sender does not
> receive the ack.  Resending is almost always going to be wrong.

Why? The only really bad thing that I can see is a client dropping IQs
answers, but the service can do the right thing by using entity
capabilities and sending the notifications to only the clients can
understand them

Fabio Forno,
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber id: ff at jabber.bluendo.com

More information about the Standards mailing list